Seven Steps To
by
Arthur Eedle B.Sc.
(It was August
1976, in a luxurious Hong Kong Government apartment high up on the rocky
southern coast at Pokfulam, overlooking the sea and islands, with a flotilla of
Chinese junks in the bay to the right, a large container ship being led into
the harbour by a very small pilot boat directly in front of the windows, and
the high-rise blocks of Wah Fu away to the left.)
“Shall we sit on the veranda,
Alan?” I said to my old friend.
“Why not? It’s a very still evening. -
- - My word, look at that
sunset.”
“Marvellous, isn’t it? We’ve had several since being
here. Last time, about a month ago, I took some shots and the slides came out a
treat,” I said.
Our Amah (house-girl) served us with a pot of coffee,
whilst our ladies chatted in the lounge. We’d enjoyed a special dinner, and it
was good to sit and relax in the evening twilight. It was hot and very humid,
but we’d learned to cope with it - well, just about! And the mosquitoes weren’t nearly so numerous
at this height. Our neighbours were enjoying themselves in their swimming pool
down below.
“How long before you go on leave, Arthur?”
“Next April. I’ll be glad of a respite from the
humidity.”
“Thinking of returning for another tour of duty?”
“It’s all in the air just now. Too many imponderables. I
think I’ll wait until it’s nearer the time. There’s no hurry.”
We sat in silence for a while, enjoying the scene, with
the ever-darkening reds in the western sky.
“You still do quite a lot of private study and research,
don’t you?”
“Yes,” I answered, “and recently it’s been a mixture of
calendars, astronomy, and Biblical study.”
“I’m intrigued!
Tell me more.”
“It was triggered off by a recent article in the Journal
of the Royal Astronomical Society - .”
“You’re a Fellow, I believe?”
“Yes, have been since 1957. Much of what they print goes
over my head, but now and again I find something of particular interest. As I
was saying, there was this article, about the Star of Bethlehem, you know, an
attempt to determine what it could have been.”
Alan laughed.
“You find that amusing?”
“Sorry, old man. No offence meant. It’s just that I’ve
always had a secret admiration for the work you’ve done in the past. But this
seems a bit bizarre, and perhaps a waste of your time and energy.”
“How come? You
don’t disbelieve in the Star, do
you?” I protested.
“I don’t know what to make of it. -
- Now don’t take me wrong. I’m
all for the
“Difficult to unscramble, but not necessarily incredible.
So what’s your problem?” I asked.
“Well, before I answer that, tell me, are you really doing a bit of research on the
subject?” Alan was becoming more
serious.
“I’ve hardly started. Furthermore, facilities are rather
limited here. I used to frequent the R.A.S. library at Burlington House in
Piccadilly. They had everything there an
astronomer might want, and it was easy to lay my hands on the stuff I needed,
but here it’s like a wilderness by comparison.
“Yes, and that’s what you ought to be doing again, if you
don’t mind me saying. - -Most interesting theory. - - I really enjoyed reading it.
I thought it was likely to shake up the old fuddy-duddies who can’t get away
from their uniformitarian concepts. Nothing like a few good explosions, you
know! All those craters in
“Yes, I know what you mean. I spent a good few years
working on that, but this Bethlehem Star project is getting under my skin. The
more I think about it, the more intrigued I become. -
- - But spill the beans - what
makes it a Cinderella to you?”
“Simply because it’s a non-starter. You’ll just be
wasting your time, Arthur. I’ve had a go at it myself - good
time ago now - and found too many anomalies in the Gospel
stories to get a fix on anything.”
“But this is important to me. Too many people are
laughing at the birth of Christ. Goodness knows how many clerics have thrown
out the baby with the bathwater - I’m sorry, I’ve just realised what I’ve said,
no blasphemy meant.”
Alan laughed, spluttering coffee and choking at the
unintended joke.
“Yes, I know what you mean,” he said, “but I think we’ll
just have to enjoy the Christmas story and not look too deeply into the
folklore mixed up with it.”
“Folklore!” I exploded. “Alan, normally I have great
respect for you. You’re a fully-fledged lecturer in physics at the
“O.K., I’ll be more serious.” He put his coffee on the table and cleared
his throat. “Now it goes something like this
- stars don’t move along and come
to rest over stables, whether generically they are true stars, comets, planets,
super-novæ, meteors, or anything else that flies around up there. That’s the
first thing. But if you’re out to prove the chronology of Christ’s birth - .”
“That was my intention,” I interrupted.
“Right, then there are other factors that don’t add up -
.”
“Such as?”
“Jesus’ birth couldn’t have been later than B.C.4,
because Herod died in that year. You’ll find all the textbooks are agreed on
that date. But the census Luke mentions was in A.D.6, and though he says there
was an earlier one, history records no governorship to Quirinius before
A.D.6. Furthermore, the account of the
three wise men is an anachronism, and doesn’t fit the story in respect of
Joseph’s travels. One says he went back to
Alan folded his arms above his head, sat back in his
chair and awaited my reply.
“But I’m quite aware of those apparent contradictions,
and that’s what makes it fascinating. It’s a brainteaser, Alan, and I’d love
the exercise! You know what I’m like with puzzles of this sort. I can’t leave
them alone until I’ve satisfied my mind.”
“O.K., but you’ll never make heads or tails of it. Mind
you, if you want to attack it just for the sheer hell of the game, then that’s
fine by me. Tell you what - give yourself a few months - yes, what about
next April? That’s a splendid idea, - let’s have a wager on it. If you come up
with anything positive by then, we’ll stand you a farewell dinner at the Peak
Tower Restaurant.”
“And if I don’t, then I suppose the dinner’s on me?”
We both laughed, and left it at that. Alan had one last
suggestion.
“Tell you what, old
man, I think I might be able to help you out. I’ll get you a pass so that you
can use the University Library. They’ve a good selection of stuff up there. You
can show your ticket and use the car parking facilities, then take the lift up
to the library. There are plenty of photocopying machines around the place.”
“Thanks. That’s good of you. I’ll ransack the place to
see if I can find anything useful. I must
you know. I’m looking forward to that dinner!”
And so the conversation ended as we turned to other
things, and eventually joined the ladies in the lounge.
That was the beginning of a hunt that went on for many
years. The following April I told Alan I’d made some small progress, showing
him that there might be a way through the maze of perplexities. He wasn’t very
convinced, but treated us to our farewell dinner just the same!
We never returned to
But all through those years I never lost sight of my
task, and whenever I had the chance I would get the study books out again, and
do a little more digging. One book was especially valuable, and this was found
in the Hong Kong University Library, thanks to Alan. It was “Elements of the Jewish and Muhammadan
Calendars” by Sherrard Beaumont Burnaby (1901). Even the few pages I’d photocopied set me to
work, and back in
And so, using
The results were committed to print, and privately
published in fourteen parts, and sent out in 1988 to some friends and
acquaintances on our mailing list, free of charge.
Now it is 2002. Many more years have gone by, and it’s time
to reassess the material in the light of further developments, and present the
story again, this time I hope in a more readable fashion than before. I feel
the urgency to do this, perhaps for my own sake, to complete a task and feel
the satisfaction of having (eventually!) reached a goal, even though, sadly, I
was never able to communicate the result to Alan due to his early demise.
One final word. In the Old Testament (1 Chronicles
Arthur
Eedle
-
- - - - - - -oOo- -
- - - - - -
-
AUTHOR’S ADDITIONAL NOTE
I originally published “Seven Steps to
This presentation comes as a result of completely
re-writing that work, together with a considerable addition of material
gathered in more recent years.
The title of the book can best be explained in the
following way. On assessing all the available material, it soon became apparent
that there were SEVEN distinct areas of research that needed to be covered to
reach the goal, namely, the date and time of Jesus’ birth in
Step 1. The
darkness over the land at the crucifixion.
Step 2. Luke’s
mention of the 15th year of Tiberius Cæsar.
Step 3. The
governorships of Quirinius.
Step 4. Herod’s
dates, and the Lunar Eclipse of Josephus.
Step 5. The
Climate of the Judæan Hills.
Step 6. Zachariah
and the Course of Abijah.
Step 7. The Wise
Men and the Star.
Each one of these “Steps” will be presented as a Part in
the writing. Some Parts will be longer than others, depending on the amount of
material needing to be covered to reach the seven conclusions.
Although I believe
I have found a satisfactory answer to the vexed questions surrounding this
chronological study, it will at least be of some interest and perhaps
fascination to know about the great variety of suggestions put forward by other
workers in this field. This information has been amassed by Dr. Jerry Vardman
and Dr. Edwin M. Yamauchi and presented in their book, “Chronos, Kairos,
Christos”, (published by Eisenbrauns, 1989). The state of confusion
unearthed by the authors is prodigious. There are theories that range from
B.C.12 to B.C.3 for the birth of Christ, and from A.D.26 to A.D.36 for the
Crucifixion, all presented exactly as the investigators published.
These authors were not the first to gather such
information together. The task had been performed way back in 1933 by U.
Holzmeister, and presented in his book entitled “Chronologia Vitæ Christi”.
In his survey he mentioned the names of no less than 58 modern authors (of his
day) and of these, 33 selected nativity dates between B.C.7 and B.C.5. But of
the 42 ancient opinions listed, only one chose a date before B.C 4, the
supposed time of death of Herod the Great.
It is against this background that I now present my own
findings, and hope that the simplicity of the logic will attract attention and
cause scholars to re-assess their position. I am particularly interested in
giving the New Testament writers the accolade of genuineness they deserve,
rather than treating them (as sadly, some scholars do) simpletons, charlatans,
or religious zealots with dubious agendas.
Arthur
Eedle, November 2002