SEVEN STEPS TO
STEP ONE
DARKNESS OVER
THE LAND AT THE CRUCIFIXION
There is
adequate historical evidence relating to the strange darkness that covered the
1. On which day of the week did Jesus
die?
2. Which day was this, 14th or 15th
Nisan?
3. Was He in the
grave for "three days and three nights"?
4. On which day of
the week did Jesus rise from the dead?
5. Can we know what
calendars were in force at the time?
All this
will need to be addressed before it's possible to evaluate the usefulness of
the historical evidence about the darkness. The nine chapters in this part are
therefore designed to tackle these problems.
CHAPTER 1
“GOOD FRIDAY”, or was it “GOOD WEDNESDAY”
or maybe “GOOD THURSDAY”?
Until
the beginning of this century the day of the Crucifixion had hardly ever been
questioned. It was always “Good Friday.” But more and more of recent days there
has been a move to think otherwise. This has been spawned by a desire to show a
greater faithfulness to the literal words of Jesus, “the Son of Man shall
be THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS in the heart of the earth.” (Matthew
12:40) Exponents of the newer theories say that such words cannot satisfy the
traditional view of one whole day and two nights.
Many years ago I was greatly enamoured by the presentation
shown by Dr.E.W.Bullinger in his “Companion Bible”, (an excellent study
Bible,) whereby he tried to prove that Jesus died on Wednesday and rose towards
the end of Saturday. It certainly allowed for a full “three days and three
nights”, and at the time I imagined he had solved the problem. Some friends
of the fellowship I attended in the 1950s were also of this mind, and presented
an article in a journal published by The Lamp Press,
Allow me to explain why they thought this was the key. The
words in parentheses are the ones that matter. In the Greek original there is
an emphasis which I’ve conveyed by using the upper case - THAT. Those who
espouse the Wednesday crucifixion model say that John was referring to the
following day, (Thursday,) as a High Sabbath, whereas those who retain
the more traditional view accept that John
was merely saying that the next day, Saturday, was a special day because
it was a feast day.
“THAT Sabbath was an High Day.” Yes, these words were
used by John to explain to his readers, many of whom he knew would be Gentiles,
that in the Feast of Passover and Unleavened Bread, there were to be two
special days which had to be treated as if they were Sabbaths, even if they
occurred mid-week. The regulation was spelled out in Leviticus 23:5-8. “In
the 14th day of the 1st month at even is the Lord’s Passover. And on the 15th
day of the same month is the Feast of Unleavened Bread unto the Lord. Seven
days you must eat unleavened bread. In the 1st day you shall have a Holy
Convocation, you shall do no laborious work therein. - - In the 7th day is a
Holy Convocation, you shall do no laborious work therein.”
It will be helpful at this stage to draw up a simple time
diagram to show three models, three proposed schemes for presenting the “three
days and three nights.”
Type 1 was presented by Bullinger in the Companion
Bible,
Type 2 espoused around the turn of the century by Professor Totten, (who argued
that Jesus was crucified on Thursday,)
Type 3 the more traditional view of a
Friday crucifixion and Sunday resurrection.
|
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
P |
1HD |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7HD |
|
|
|
Type 1 |
|
|
P |
1HD |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7HD |
|
|
Type 2 |
|
|
|
P |
1HD |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7HD |
|
Type 3 |
Legend:- P =
Passover Day, 14th Nisan, when lambs were slain, according to
Lev.23.
1,2,3,4,5,6,7 = the seven days of Unleavened Bread, as required by Mosaic law.
HD = High Days, as delineated in Lev.23, and treated as Sabbaths.
Numbers in bold type show the day considered for resurrection.
A strange new theory of recent years comes from Frank Paine,
(“Miracle of Time” 1994) who contended that Jesus was crucified on
Friday, but raised on Monday, which to my way of thinking flies in the face of
all factual evidence, and has been omitted from the time chart.
Is there any way of deciding which of these three theories
is correct? It is crucial to our investigation to know which Type is the
correct one. Without that knowledge, the way forward will be uncertain,
problematic, and unyielding for reasons that will become more apparent as we
proceed.
In the following chapters I shall address these problems
from the statements found in the Gospel records to show that the new theories
only arose because of a mistaken reverence for the literality of words
of Scripture. Without a proper understanding of figures of speech, there can be
no real appreciation of meanings. We ourselves use 101 different figures of
speech on a daily basis, and if these were translated literally into Chinese or
Swahili, or example, they would cause immense problems for readers in