Recognising the Hand of Judgment. Ch.23
The House of Windsor,
Balfour, Allenby, 1917
In
writing this chapter I have
before me two photographs,
the first showing King George Vth with the Czar of Russia in 1913. The
Czar was King George's cousin. The
second photograph shows King George Vth with the Kaiser of Germany, also taken
in 1913. And the Kaiser was also his
cousin. In that year the King was not to know the fate
that would overtake his family and Europe
in just a short while.
King George's
cousin the Kaiser was to
become his (political) enemy, which
was very hurtful to the King. But
this family tie was insufficient to prevent hostilities. In 1917 the Kaiser abdicated. It was the end of a dynastic era, where the rulers of Germany
and Prussia had
used, in the title “Kaiser” the modern form of the ancient title
"Cæsar".
And the
King felt that the Czar of Russia could not be offered sanctuary in Britain at the time of the Bolshevik revolution and
Communist take-over in 1917. He later regretted this,
when the Czar
and his family were
assassinated the following year.
It is recorded that the King said,
"I had tears in my eyes - and still have - when he spoke of the
vindictive and unnecessary murder of the poor Czar, and I was moved to deepest admiration by his revolt
over this alien
stunt." And so yet another
title, “Czar”, that was derived from "Cæsar" vanished
from national usage.
In that
same year, 1917, King George realised that his family
connections with the Kaiser of Germany, and the title of his own house,
"Saxe-Coburg-Gotha", with its
Teutonic ring, was causing bad reactions in Britain,
due to the war. He called in the heads of the Royal College of Heralds, who advised him that the choice of a new
title lay between "Wipper" and "Wettin". Happily he rejected both! Instead he chose the title WINDSOR, and so a new dynasty began on 17th day of
July 1917, THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR.
Later in
that year three other events of
great significance occurred. The
first was on the 2nd of November,
when the Foreign Secretary, Arthur Balfour, sent a letter to Lionel Walter, 2nd Baron Rothschild, chairman of the British Zionist
Federation, declaring the government's official
recognition of the
Zionist aspirations, in establishing Palestine
as a national home for the
Jews. The letter promised British
aid to Zionists. The actual
wording of the letter contained this sentence –
“His
Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a
national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to
facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that
nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political
status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. ”
The letter was issued through the
continued efforts of Chaim Weizmann and Nahum Sokolow, Zionist leaders in London, but it fell short of what they had asked for, namely
the reconstitution of Palestine as “the” Jewish national home.
Balfour’s
objective was written into the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine (dated 24th July 1922) and which was formally implemented on 29th September 1923. And so, nearly
20 years after the death of Theodor Herzl in 1904, his dream looked as though
it was being established as fact.
The second important factor occurred on December 9th
1917, when
General Edmund Allenby entered Jerusalem
and took the city from the Turk,
without a single shot being fired.
The following year he won a
sweeping victory over the Turks at Megiddo. He said that he wanted to present Jerusalem
to the British as a "Christmas present." From that
day until May 1948, Palestine
became a British mandated territory, and all
the promises made earlier by Balfour were wiped away at a stroke. What
at first appeared as a great victory, was seen in another light by some
observers. I have already mentioned that
the date was significant according to Daniel's prophecy of the 1335 days, in that 1917 was also the 1335th year of the
Moslem calendar.
These two
events, being just a few weeks apart, caused a new surge of Zionist nationalism amongst Jewish people the
world over. The war had
taken its toll of Jews, like
everyone else in Europe.
The total number of Jews killed in the war has been
estimated at 140,000,
the majority being Russians.
The third event was, of course, the Russian revolution, dated 7th
November on the Gregorian calendar, but
called the “October Revolution” because in Russia they still used the Old Style
Calendar. Now Lenin was deeply sensitive
to the sufferings of Russian Jewry under the Czarist regime, and when the revolution broke,
all restrictive and
oppressive anti-Jewish
legislation was swept away at a stroke.
This was of course welcomed by Jews
of all persuasions. Even the Bolshevik seizure of power
eight months later was
not at first perceived as
a danger, since
the Bolshevik leaders had affirmed their sympathy for the Jews, and indeed some of
them were Jews themselves. But the
new party failed
to eradicate anti-Jewish prejudice in Russia,
and to it they added their own ideologically
motivated persecution of the Jewish religion, and the
"counter-revolutionary" Zionist movement. Hence the great contribution to Russia,
brought about by the loss of patriotic
Jewish manpower during the war,
was not remembered with sympathy, but swept away in the rising tide of the new
communist oppression.
1917 appeared
therefore as a year of release for the
Jews, and Britain was in the lead of the countries favouring
the settlement of the
Jews in Palestine. But in Arthur Balfour's day it didn't produce insuperable problems for the
government. It was an idea, a declaration, that envisaged action at some future
time. When that time came, Britain
behaved in a manner that caused permanent shame to the nation.