A series of articles on Ancient British Christianity
No.11. Augustine’s letter to
Pope Gregory, A.D. 600
“In the
western confines of
Epistolae ad Gregorium Papam.
This letter is quoted by several authors writing
on the subject of
First of all, it must be said that although
the quotation formed a part of a letter sent by Augustine, it was definitely not based on his own observations. In
fact, if history can be relied upon, it is highly doubtful that Augustine ever
ventured down into
What is definitely known is that two historians, writing some 400 - 500 years later, referred to the text of this letter, and by the way in which they reported it, suggested its existence in ancient documents prior to the time of Augustine, so that the Roman Monk must have been shown the text, and decided to quote it in his letter to Gregory. These two historians were a Saxon Priest known only by the letter “B”, writing on the life of St. Dunstan, and William of Malmsebury.
Dunstan died in 988, and “B”, his first
biographer dedicated his work to Elfric, who ruled
the
And thus, the
boy [Dunstan] grew up and was cherished by God and His beloved men, moreover he
was in the boundary of a royal island of the same above-mentioned men, called Glastonia, filled with broad hollow places, surrounded by
sluggish rivers, whose waters are filled with fish and suitable to serve many
human needs, and best of all, consecrated to sacred offices. In it the earliest
Angles, neophytes of the Catholic Rule, God guiding them, found an ancient
church, not built by art of man, but divinely prepared for the salvation of
mankind, which church the Heavenly Builder Himself declared – by many miracles
and sacred mysteries– He had consecrated to Himself and to Mary, the holy
Mother of God.”
About 100
years later William of Malmsebury wrote his treatise entitled “De Antiquitate Glastonie Ecclesie” (The
Early History of Glastonbury). In chapter 1 he gives tolerably the same
quotation, showing that he had read the text of the Saxon Priest. It reads as
follows:
“That these things are so, we learn from
both the Charter of the Blessed Patrick, and from the writings of the Elders,
of whom one, the historian of the Britons, just as we saw in the case of St. Edmund,
and in the case of St. Augustine the Apostle of the English, began his account
thus:
There is on
the confines of Western Britain a certain royal island, called in the ancient
speech Glastonia, spacious and undulating, girt round
with waters rich in fish, and sluggish rivers, fit to serve many human needs,
and, best of all, consecrated to sacred offices. In it the earliest Angles,
neophytes of the Catholic Rule, God guiding them, found an ancient church, not
built by art of man, so they say, but prepared by God Himself for the
salvation of mankind, which church the Heavenly Builder Himself declared – by
many miracles and sacred mysteries– He had consecrated to Himself and to Mary,
the holy Mother of God.”
There is
a very interesting difference between these two writings. It may be seen by the
expression underlined in William’s version. The Latin is ut ferunt, and is clearly William’s own
comment on the information he’d just quoted. It shows the early development of
scepticism. In the Saxon Priest’s document it does not occur, but he places it
in the margin, showing that he is quoting from much earlier documents, one of which
contains the phrase.
The
evidence from these two primary sources may be summarised as follows. Prior to
the time of Augustine, a certain document was well known, containing the above
quotation. It was later found in the writings of St. Patrick, of the Elders,
(whoever they were), and of
“No other human hands made the church at
Glastonbury, but Christ’s disciples founded and built it by angelic doctrine,
an unattractive structure, certainly, but adorned by God with manifold virtue;
the High Priest of the heavens Himself, the Maker and Redeemer of mankind, our
Lord Jesus Christ, in His true presence dedicated it to Himself and His most
holy mother. On account of its antiquity the English called this church the ‘ealdchirche’ – that is, the ‘
So
genuine and valuable was this information held by scholars and historians, that
for centuries it was never doubted. Take for example the writings of Sir Henry Spelman, (1564 – 1641) the
English antiquary, author of his most important work, Concilia, Decreta, Leges, Constitutiones in re ecclesiarum orbis Britannici (2 volumes, 1636 – 1641, and completed in 1664 by his son.) This was an attempt to document ecclesiastical history on a basis of genuine documents. The following quotations reflect this attitude.
“It is certain that
“We have abundant evidence that this
“For anyone to longer doubt the historic
authenticity of
In the Concilia
is an engraving of a brass plate which was formerly affixed to a column
erected to mark the exact site of the
“The first ground of God, the first
ground of the Saints of Britain, the rise and foundation of all religion in
Britain, the burial place of the Saints.” The plate was dug up at
Sadly, in our modern world, an age of debunking has arisen, the power of which is destroying the rich heritage of ancient British history. Our wish is to place on record the earliest sources, and give them the place they deserve in the records of history. But more than that, we want to rebuild the confidence in these early texts, and as a result see what God built in this land just a few years after the resurrection, and how that affects our national position in His sight in these latter days.